"Final Reality" Benchmark - V2SLI beats V5

[trigger]

Voodoo2 SLI beats Voodoo5 5500?

The screenshot below shows a comparison between the two. Both done on the exact same PC.
The purple bar is the Voodoo5 5500(PCI 1.18DVI Bios)



Overall Reality Marks for the Voodoo2SLI was 6.63, while the Voodoo5 5500 only got 6.16.
But check out the fill rate what goes on there?

AOPEN MX3S (Pentium 1GHz) 512Mb PC133 SDRAM
Windows 98
FastVoodoo2 4.6
Raziel64 Evolution Driver Expert Edition V1.00.09  

Can anyone provide me their results? Especially the fill rate!
Go Postal!

You can grab the benchmark here!
http://www.instantnetworks.net/mirror/finalreality/

[kaneda-san]

1.16 use... or 0.9...

[Chips]

I know I've already sent this to you Trigger, but just showing everyone else here - I'm using WinXP Amigamerlin R11.  Fill rate seems fine here.  Does Win98 really make a difference?

Image Insert:

55.94 KB

[trigger]

Yep.. I've tried different drivers under windows 98 but all return a crap fill rate.

If anyone has a decent fill rate for the voodoo5 5500 under Windows 98 please post details.

Much apprieciated.

[NitroX infinity]

I think the problem here is the CPU which only runs at 1GHz. Someone should compare the two with a more powerfull CPU (2400+/2.6GHz)

The Voodoo 5 isn't maxed out here because the CPU can't supply enough data to it.

[Raff3DC]

Well, it's not Win98 and no fillrate ... but a nice result. Voodoo2 won't ever reach that.



Tbred @ ~218x11 = 2392 MHz, 3dfx Voodoo5 5500 PCI 64 MiB @ 190/190, SFFT Alpha 32.

Greetings from Germany,
Raff

[Chips]

Originally posted by NitroX infinity

I think the problem here is the CPU which only runs at 1GHz. Someone should compare the two with a more powerfull CPU (2400+/2.6GHz)

The Voodoo 5 isn't maxed out here because the CPU can't supply enough data to it.

Umm, so how do you explain my fill rate with the K6-III+ 550Mhz??